top of page

Who is the beneficial owner of a transferred property?

  • Writer: Shankar Law Office
    Shankar Law Office
  • May 27, 2024
  • 2 min read

Updated: 8 hours ago



An interesting question that recently arose related to who was the beneficial owner of a property after having transferred to his son?


This was discussed in McCready v. McCready, 2024 ONSC 2922 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/k4spt.


During the marriage the respondent transferred the Hwy 522 property to himself and to his adult son, as joint tenants, for no consideration.  The parties separated several years after this transfer.  The respondent argues the transfer was a gift.  The applicant disagrees and submits the legal and beneficial ownership of the property remains with the respondent pursuant to a resulting trust.


So who is the actual owner of the property?


A beneficial owner has been described as “the real owner of property even though it is in someone else’s name”: Pecore v. Pecore, 2007 SCC 17 at para 4.  The presumption of resulting trust can be rebutted by evidence establishing, on a balance of probabilities, the transferor’s intention to gift the property.


A party that seeks to establish that a transfer was a gift must show the following three conditions have been met, as set out in Falsetto v. Falsetto, 2023 ONCA 469, at para. 27:


a. The donor intended to gift the property;

b. The gift was accepted by the recipient; and

c.  A sufficient act of delivery or transfer of the property occurred to complete the transaction.


What did the judge conclude?:


The evidence, considered as a whole, was clear about the respondent’s intention to gift an interest in the Hwy 522 property to his son. The Court found that the intention of the respondent was that his son would live there and help the respondent manage the property during their lives.  There is insufficient evidence the property was intended as a gift and survivorship adds nothing to prove this fact.  The respondent has accordingly failed to rebut the presumption. So the judge found that the respondent was actually the beneficial owner of the property despite having feigned to have transferred it to his son.


As one can see, this case has a lot of the analysis depending on the research, understanding and application of case law to the facts of the case. This requires analysis, research and reading. We do this well at Shankar Law.


We are happy to help clients virtually anywhere in Ontario!


We now have four offices conveniently located to serve you better in Owen Sound, Port Elgin, Wiarton, and Kincardine. Serving the Lake Huron and Georgian Bay Shorelines from Goderich to Collingwood and the surrounding areas. We are here to help with all of your Family Law, Criminal Law, Real Estate Law and Will matters.

 
 
  • Facebook - White Circle
  • LinkedIn - White Circle
Contact Us
Thanks for submitting!

PORT ELGIN OFFICE:

582 Hepner Cresent

Port Elgin, Ontario N0H 2C0

Tel: 226-256-8054 x 106

WIARTON OFFICE:

582 Berford Street 

Wiarton, Ontario N0H 2T0

Tel: 226-256-8054 x 109

Owen Sound Office

KINCARDINE OFFICE:

329 Durham Market Street North,

Kincardine, Ontario N2Z 1Z4

Tel: 226-256-8054 

​​​​© 2020 by Shankar Law Office

Logo

OWEN SOUND OFFICE:

968 - 2nd Avenue West

Owen Sound, Ontario N4K 4M7

Tel: 226-256-8054 x 102

Terms of Use: The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult a lawyer for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as a lawyer-client relationship has been established.
bottom of page